Who or which organisation should be responsible to churn up such talents for the industries? The talents must be trained or educated and feed the market. The demands from the industries are ready talents, not talents that the industries would be producing or trained.The industries did not see it taking up the responsibility train talents for their own needs. Practically every organisation expects to fill their positions from trained and experienced people from the open market or from the rest of the world.
With this kind of mindset, the burden of providing educated and in some way trained talents must come from the institutions of higher learning, the polytechnics and universities. The irony here is that Singapore often boasts about its world class and very expensive universities, high fees because they are the best, at least better than the countries mentioned above. The why is it that these countries, with universities that mostly ranked at the tail end of surveys, are able to provide the talents but not Singapore?
A survey like this, and all
craps coming out from employment agencies, even from third world
countries, are as good as a dressing down on Singaporean talents,
Singapore's institutions of higher learning. Useless universities, but
very expensive, unable to provide talents for the industries. Are these
real? Such smearing of local universities and their products is kind of
being spread and supported even by the who's who in Singapore. Not only
they did not dispute such disgusting smears, they also supported them by
their actions, by employing foreigners to fill top management positions
and often seen engaging foreign head hunters to hunt around the world
for top management positions. And such disgraceful thoughts and comments
are repeated quite often by the local media as if this is the truth,
this is the fact, Singapore has no talents. Why are local media
celebrating such lies, backing up such lies, like the survey mentioned
As long as the stupidity has no cure idiots keep allowing this narrative to go on and on, who would want to employ local graduates? On the other hand, the third world countries are praising their own graduates from their funny universities as better than Singapore graduates. And the Singapore;s idiotic who's who accept this without protest, without question, and happily filled even govt positions with funny foreign graduates from funny universities, including fakes and cheats.
What do all these mean to our institutions of higher learnings and Singapore education as a whole? Would it be cheaper and more productive to close them all down and send all our young to the funny universities around us, cheaper and better?
What do you think? What pay so much for a piece of a paper that cannot be eaten, and cannot get a good job?PS. There are many Singaporean talents overseas but unable to return, unable to find equivalent positions in Singapore, simply because the imbeciles allowed the foreigners to set the narrative, to control the employment industry, to decide who is talent, who to be employed. This is a crime committed by the imbeciles against our very own talents, with many local PMETs now retrenched, unemployed, underemployed or forced to retire prematurely.