Now we have this dubious honour of sharing in the hiring of
a fake as an academic staff and publishing many papers to help in our rankings.
How would this affect our university’s rankings? Is this another one of those,
‘it happens once in 50 years’ cases? If it is so, then we should thank God that
it would not cause too much damage to our reputation. If it is not the case,
and many more are fakes, then we will have a very embarrassing problem at hand.
How would we know that there are other fakes in the academia?
The only way to find out is to comb through with a fine brush, the academic
qualifications of the staff, especially the foreigners. The question is, do we
want to do this and risk our rankings and reputations tumbling to the abyss? My
suggestion is not to do anything. Let it be. Then we can keep our rankings and
the integrity of the institutions? Did I say integrity? Oops, wrong choice of
word definitely. Change that to reputation.
How many people really think that there is a need for a thorough
investigation in the academia for fraudsters? This disease of having fakes and
fraudsters in the whole island has been spreading and the writing has been on
the wall for too long. And it is not only in the academia! It is something that
must be done and in a hurry. But no one bothers. Or is this problem already
known in the closed circles and the solution is to announce that no degrees
also can if one can perform, and can be promoted to high positions too.
Definitely not! These are two separate issues.
Do we have a problem? Yes, no? Do we want to acknowledge
that we have a problem? Do we then want to address this problem? If all the
answers are no, then we have no problems and Rip Van Winkle can go back to
sleep for another 50 years. We can continue to plan for the big 50 year
celebrations and party.
Some say the best solution to a nasty problem is to look the
other way. Don’t talk about it, don’t do anything is the best.
No comments:
Post a Comment